99 Comments
User's avatar
Yo Habi's avatar

I love what Arsenal are doing. There's no way I pay over a £100m for Morgan Rogers. There are many players who can be if better use than Rogers there's no need to worry. Chelsea have become famous for spending recklessly probably to hurt Arsenal but it's not worked well for them .

Arsenal are in a very stable position right now and ut won't make sense to start spending based on enotion or just to ward off an opponent.

Better days are ahead for Arsenal. No regrets whatsoever.

Digital's avatar

One thing we cannot do is look at any of the no longer required wingers at Chelsea. Garnacho, Gittens, or the more likely Neto. Please don’t do it Berta.

Terence Black's avatar

Buying Madueke was a complete disaster.

Useroz's avatar

wouldn't recoup half of £52 (or 55?) now...

jwl's avatar

From a sports journo at The Times -

"This summer, Josh Kroenke was briefly involved in informal talks with the Aston Villa owners regarding Morgan Rogers. Villa were unhappy with the approach to negotiations by Arsenal, who were trying to hold informal talks through intermediaries.

Arsenal indicated they would be willing to offer about £80m & it is understood they would have paid just over £100m, but were NOT prepared to meet Villa’s £120m valuation, which had increased based on the value of other transfers completed this summer.

Had Arsenal not dragged their feet, they could have wrapped up the deal weeks ago for about £100m, but perhaps still thought last week that an offer in that range may have been accepted."

raptora's avatar
10mEdited

Newcastle agreed to sell Gordon in May! Nearly two months ago.

We could have totally made a deal with Villa if we had agreed to pay what their original valuation of £100m was. Probably £90m would have been enough.

We can criticize the club on being scattergun in their approach, at least from what we know. It's Berta's MO. It's how he does things and only now people are starting to see his approach could be beneficial but it's also a double edged sword. Players don't feel the personal touch, they don't trust him, they believe he's taking them for a ride but might drop them at any given moment cause he's working many players at the same time. It's not ideal and probably not what I want to see at my favorite football club.

JoppaRoad's avatar

Madueke is exactly what everyone thought he would be. Not a chance he should be ahead of Nwaneri. Very disappointing. £55M! They always see us coming. Not buying it either that we have to run a tight ship. We're champions, CL runners up and you saw the turn out for the parade. Start acting like a big club and kick on.

Yossarian's avatar

I keep flip flopping on whether I’d prefer Bruno Guimarães or Alex Scott. Right now, Bruno is the better player and his range of passing would be a massive plus for our midfielder. But Odegaard is no longer a 10 and so I’m not convinced Bruno, Ode and Rice work together.

Scott is a great player already and brings a really similar skill set to Bernardo Silva. He is also at an age where he has so much space to grow further - and I now think if they’re both going to be similar prices, I’d go for Alex Scott.

raptora's avatar
1hEdited

You're right about the price range. From what we know £80m or thereabouts, seals the deal for either of the two.

I know it's an unpopular opinion but I'd be selling Myles and bringing both Scott and Bruno G.

Like, I keep thinking about something I read yesterday from Adam Crafton, reporter for The Athletic and two times Journalist of the year:

“I had a conversation in May with somebody that’s incredibly well-connected in European football, he said that the people he was speaking to were saying that Arsenal were ready to do some seriously disruptive business this summer to get to the next level.”

That makes me excited about the club holding firm on their valuation of someone, so they can maybe afford another. Like, are we moving Myles or Ethan to get two midfielders? Are we swapping Gyok and Julian? Are we with a real shot of landing Vini Jr? I can't wait but I hope the club has a solid plan and I would like to see us ambitious to reach that next level and get closer to PSG and Europe's elite.

Dissenter's avatar

This Julian Alvarez rumors may have lots of meat in them.

Most of the widely circulated rumors about Arsenal’s transfers have been largely confirmed.

They better figure it out fast, aim well and execute properly because if they don’t they would unsettle a player who walked on glass to come to us and probably piss off elements in the squad who may have formed bonds with the said player that are planning to use as part of a trade. Right now the Scandinavian players is vacation with his German buddy.

The player they are seeking wants Barca first, so we are a secondary option. He’ll consider us only if his first love jilts him so we’ll be his rebound relationship.

Never mind how much you rate him but what type of elite value system is that.

They better make sure their execution of that complicated deal is flawless because if they fail, the fallout may be serious.

In the famous words of Omar Little, “You come at the king, you best not miss"

Yossarian's avatar

I think I'd probably leave striker for this year - see if Kroupi has another season at the same level of the last one, and then go for him next summer if so. If not, see who else is on the market. Havetz, Gyok and Merino are fine this year if we had a world-class left winger (Barcola or Williams for me) and also a goalscoring midfielder.

raptora's avatar

Gary Jacob & Simon Collings

Arsenal have begun direct talks with Newcastle United to sign Bruno Guimarães.

Newcastle are likely to have a decision to make if Arsenal formally offer about £75m.

Dissenter's avatar

At least now Newcastle won’t question the possibility that we can walk away if the deal ain’t right.

We’ve proven that already.

raptora's avatar

But to counter that thought process, if Anderson is worth £116m, Villa were right to ask for £117m for Rogers.

Anderson is a £80m player imo, so our ~£85m valuation of Rogers was correct. But the market is what the market is.

Dream10's avatar

Barcelona interested in Rodri.

Need to speed up the Bruno Guimarāes deal because City may revisit their interest in him

adetunji adelekan's avatar

Let's hope Nwaneri takes his chance during preseason and blows Arteta away

Dream10's avatar

Hope he's given the time to play thru terrible spells like Havertz and Madueke were

Jamie's avatar

Madueke is still playing through his terrible spell.

Dream10's avatar

😂😂😂

adetunji adelekan's avatar

With fitness issues potentially limiting a good start, I would rather Arsenal take decisions that benefit the club longterm.

First, Im not unhappy about Rogers because I believe he's a better fit playing through the middle. Playing from the left would have slowed our game further. It's best we go for a quick winger that's guaranteed to do damage from the left wing.

Nico Williams is still a great option despite his injury issues. Some players overcome it. It stopped us from going for Pedro Neto and the guy's been fit since signing for Chelsea.

Second, I would rather sign Alex Scott for 80M instead of Guimaraes whom cannot be sold in the next years. We need to think longterm because we don't have crazy money like some.

Winning the title this season isn't guaranteed for Arsenal especially because our major players need a break. I believe our plan should be signing players who are perfect fit for the next 5 years at least.

raptora's avatar

"Nico Williams is still a great option despite his injury issues."

He said he finally feels healthy and his debilitating pubalgia is finally behind him. He got another injury later in the season but it wasn't what he's been suffering with for a really long time. He might be at his all-time low now. Best chance to get him.

Yossarian's avatar

I agree pretty much entirely with this.

Dissenter's avatar

“ Nico Williams is still a great option despite his injury issues. Some players overcome it”

You don’t think we have enough of that problem?

“How many minutes did he play last season and in the World Cup”

EMIRATESSTROLLER's avatar

I have watched a number of games in which Rogers played for England and frankly have seen

nothing in his repertoire to suggest that he is world class or justifies an EPL record transfer fee.

He is not currently a first string England International and is probably on a similar level to Eze.

Eze cost half what Chelsea have now paid for Rogers. The only difference is that Rogers is a

younger player at 23.

Arsenal do need to be proactive in transfer market, but if we are going to pay mega bucks it

should be to recruit a "specialist" left wing or centre forward.

Dream10's avatar

Have a funny feeling Arsenal will opt for Neto from Chelsea as the winger signing. Arteta wanted to sign him in '22 or '23. Apparently Spurs are interested

No news on Mbaye of PSG, Maza of Leverkusen or Camara of Monaco yet

Dissenter's avatar

Ha, there will be riots where there once ecstatic celebrations

People are tired of these Chelsea rejects

Arteta famously defended the practice last summer. He said “ Probably because they (Chelsea)have some great players, and a lot of players. We try to focus on the players we want to sign regardless of the club."

Dream10's avatar

I'm worried because Neto, Garnacho and Gittens are all available for transfer. And Arsenal are currently not willing to spend 100m on creative players. Chelsea have three 40-50m options ready lol

Yossarian's avatar

This really is the stuff of nightmares...

Dissenter's avatar

Does anyone still think the hand of Arsenal is a serious source

That fella is having a meltdown.

He made a colossal mistake with the Rogers story. He was chatting nonsense about senior Arsenal executives meeting with Villa executives in a Teepee tent at Hyde park whilst Rogers was already committed to Villa

Rather than just stay quiet, now he’s spinning stories to hide his initial mistake.

Thorough's avatar

Stop fishing. He’s as authoritative as they get. We were interested. Because we dithered doesn’t mean we weren’t. Let it go.

Bob's avatar

Emirates coughing up more money for shirt and stadium sponsorship!

Dissenter's avatar

We’ve been good partners for them Bob

Bob's avatar

For sure. Two years left on the deal suggests they’ll be paying up significantly.

raptora's avatar
1hEdited

£60m-a-year in the last agreement from 2023 (matching Real Madrid's package), to supposedly £70m-a-year now.

Dissenter's avatar

Also I’ll be damned if Arsenal don’t let Jesus leave for £5-10 million if he survives the preseason.

Who wouldn’t want to be rid of his £265k weekly wages.

Dream10's avatar

Haysus injury prone on 265k with a year left. Havertz and Odegaard with two years years left with wages in the 250-275k range & injuries. Saka on 300k a week with injuries

Dissenter's avatar

Jesus aside, there’s a common denominator in these injuries; Arteta the great- the breaker of player’s bodies.This manager hasn’t met a footballer he fancies, whose body he hasn’t broken.

The club pays them excessively so Arteta can break them.

Dream10's avatar

Wonder if targets, especially the younger ones are passing on signing with Arsenal due to their injury history (high wages can cover many sins)

Dissenter's avatar

I do think they have to take a hard look at these stupid wages we pay average players.

The fix isn’t going to be pretty. It will be short term pain to rectify it.

Our wage system is a bit of a mess and I’m trying to be nice so raptora doesn’t come in and sting me for disloyalty.

raptora's avatar

David Ornstein

Man City reach agreement to sign Mishel Nduka after midfield talent left Arsenal. #AFC offered competitive long-term deal but 16yo England youth int’l chose #MCFC & will do medical before joining on scholarship with pro contract to follow.

_____________________________________

Plenty of hits the club is taking recently. Not a reason to worry but I hope they've got a good plan cause it's a tough window to navigate for sure.

Dissenter's avatar

Did you know about the great Mishel Nduka before the news broke?

It must be a “tough window to navigate for sure”.

raptora's avatar
2hEdited

I'm trying to be sympathetic with the club and you're just being an a*s.

Missing on some of our targets + youth talents leaving + no clear indication we've got anyone of note in the bag + our only transfers are the 3rd GK of Leeds and a roll of the dice on a 24.5yo from the mighty Belgian league, who played in Bundesliga 2 a couple of seasons ago.

The market is out of control and we're doing our best to navigate through it.

The season starts in a month.

Dissenter's avatar

I think you’re being a drama queen with that “tough window to navigate” tripe.

How can it be tough when they’ve given you ample material to gripe about.

I mean, Gyokeres has a Belgian companion to draw your world famous scrutiny.